Click to Play 20sec MP3 Audio of ABC News July 1969

The Movie "The Dish" was released in Australia in October 2000
It was shown at the London Film Festival in November 2000
Limited release in the USA occurred on 14 March. National release is due 27 April
Release in the UK is expected this year


The movie is a comedy based on Australia's role in the Apollo 11 Mission in July 1969

During Apollo 11 I was the Deputy Station Director of the Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station, responsible for Operations. My role was to co-ordinate all the resources supporting the mission, including CSIRO's Parkes radio telescope. I therefore had first hand knowledge of the mission and Australia's part

The movie is amusing and enjoyable, but is misleading and wrong in many historical areas. These errors denigrate the role played by many people including those at Parkes. Following are specific areas of criticism.

But first - the authoritative book on Apollo tracking is almost with us. Hamish Lindsay, one of the Honeysuckle team, has spent years putting it together. Although focussing on Apollo and manned missions, and Australia, it covers the history of all the space programs and missions in 440 pages with over 100 photoes and illustrations. Go look for it on Amazon, or Springer or your local bookstore. Click on the jacket image below for more details, and in particular read Chris Kraft's foreword - "Hamish Lindsay has done a marvellous job of telling the story of manned flight ..."


Now back to comments on "The Dish":

1. The movie implies that Parkes was THE communication facility in Australia for Apollo 11. It certainly stated that Parkes was the only station in the Southern Hemisphere capable of receiving the TV. There are a couple of passing references to Honeysuckle Creek which are easily missed unless you are listening for them.

The truth is that Honeysuckle was THE Apollo communication facility in Australia for the lunar phases, being part of NASA's/Goddard Spacelight Center's Manned Spaceflight Network. The other Manned Flight Network station in Australia was at Carnarvon. This facility had crtical roles in the near-earth phases as well as the Lunar Experiments package. Parkes was, and is, a radio telescope - not a tracking station. Honeysuckle was built, dedicated, staffed, trained, and operated for the Apollo program only. The station was managed by the Australian Department of Supply and contracted by 130 STC personnel. NASA/JPL's facility at nearby Tidbinbilla also had dedicated Apollo equipment and people and operated as an additional receive/transmit facility. Click here for a press release by the Minister of Supply which accurately summarises the roles of the various facilities as well as many other Australian organisations with important roles (eg PMG, ABC, FACTS, OTC)

2. Parkes was nice to have. But Honeysuckle received and provided good quality TV pictures as instanced by the first step images. (Click here for some HSK images from the scan converter). Parkes was there to provide diverse back-up in case of communication problems. Such as the Lunar Module High Gain Antenna not working, or Honeysuckle's antenna/receiver system having problems. (The Apollo program made maximum use of "redundancy" where possible). There were no such problems. The slightly better quality TV picture eventually used from Parkes was a bonus.

3. Parkes had no transmitter and so could not send commands or voice to the spacecraft. So "Parkes go for Command" as used in the movie is completely wrong and misleading.

4. All Apollo communications - voice and data and command and TV - were processed within and via Honeysuckle, before or after going through one of the three antennae - Honeysuckle, Tidbinbilla, or Parkes. The only exception was Parkes TV. This was processed and selected in Sydney. Therefore all co-ordination between Houston and Australia was via Honeysuckle Creek, except Parkes TV was co-ordinated in Sydney.

Therefore Parkes did NOT speak directly to Houston. Such depictions in the movie are incorrect.

5. Parkes is shown as a vital part of communications during earth orbit and translunar coast. It could not track earth orbit and lunar coast tracking was for test and training only. It had no mission role.

6. The movie studiously avoids stating that the first TV to Australia and the world came from Honeysuckle. It (seems) to say that the first TV, while Parkes was in limits on offset feed, was taken from Goldstone. It is true that Goldstone was tried but Honeysuckle was preferred. Click here for the Honeysuckle log showing the times, and also click here for the transcript (pdf) of conversations between Honeysuckle and Houston around this time. I also wrote to Ron Ekers, John Bolton (Parkes founding Director) and Dave Cooke in 1991 with this same information - click here for my letter - and received Ron and John's acknowledgements that my information was correct. The TV images used in the movie as if originating at Parkes were probably those from Honeysuckle.

By the way, there is no mention at all of Madrid as being a third equal partner in the MSFN.

7. One of the poorest "reconstructions of history" was quoting Cliff Charlesworth's message at the end of the mission mentioning Parkes only. Cliff was Apollo 11 Flight Director. The actual message received was sent to Honeysuckle for "Parkes (via HSK)" and congratulated "Honeysuckle Creek and Tidbinbilla and the CSIRO Personnel at the Parkes 210'". I recognise that a separate message to Parkes may exist but I've not seen it. But CSIRO Parkes and Working Dog are aware of the composite one as I read it out at the Apollo 11 30th anniversary at Parkes. It would have cost the movie nothing to use the full message. Click here for the complete original message

8. The LM liftoff TV shown was not from Apollo 11 but 15 or later

9. The portrayal of the loss of the spacecraft communications link was childish. It might have been good for comedy but bore no resemblance to the professionlism needed and demonstrated by all parties, including Parkes, in real life.

10. Australia prided itself on not needing God-like NASA personnel to help them do their job. There were none at Honeysuckle during Apollo 11. In fact it was acknowledged that we knew more about how to operate than the US based experts. It is true that there were some US GSFC engineers at Parkes during Apollo 11 but support for subsequent missions at Parkes came from Tidbinbilla personnel. So the portrayal of the need for US expertise was misleading, and demeaning. Chris Kraft's message at the end of Manned Flight Tracking at Honeysuckle sums it up.

11. And just to round things off, here's a picture of a proper Prime Minister (Gorton) at a proper Tracking Station (Honeysuckle), and a picture of the Ops/Management team - Saxon, Lee, Reid, Dinn (talking to Parkes) and Grant.

In summary - some major errors, distortions and misleadings. I obviously appreciate that accuracy bending was necessary and appropriate for dramatic and comedy reasons. And I am also aware that the movie is "based" on a true event. But the actual historic events should have been sacrosanct. A lot of people will end up with misapprehensions. It will perpetuate the myth, which I have been disputing for 30 plus years, that Parkes received the TV of Armstrong's first steps and transmitted them to the world. Most of the errors could have been corrected or mitigated without detracting from the movie. Working Dog were well aware of our ability and willingness to provide expertise.

Mike Dinn - Canberra 14 October 2000 -

Revised September 2019